re: dimensions (yitz..)

dimentia ;) Re: Maharal i like that insight. the Maharal might understand an entirely different level of relativity. if the world is completely relative than the only dimensions that would 'exist' are those that are percievable, since there are 4 percievable and alterable dimensions (3 spatial & 1 spiritual(good<->bad)) he could be saying that. 

on the topic of dimensions I would like to point out something though: percieved alterability... we feel trapped in time because we must continue always forward.. yet i suggest that the ability to alter one's spatial dimensions is mostly illusion--- no matter how much motion we undertake in any one spatial dimension..is it even comparable to the momentum imparted in us by earth's motion through the solar system, or the sun's motion through the galaxy, or the galaxy's motion through the universe? our spatial flexibility is as severely limited as our temporal flexibility--one can slow down or speed up the passage of time slightly but little more. 

Also, regarding the Maharal's Nivdal dimension, because it is so separate ((also) read: kadosh), it may have complex structure of it's own that could be percieved as any # of dimensions.. or so i humbly imagine. 


One last dimension (food for) thought: 
did the initial 26-dimensional point originate @ 26 dimensions or did it build up from 0 dimensions to 26 and then break down again ? 

yitz..

Mon Jul 17, 2000 7:35 am